What seems not to be material in business may turn out to be very important in the investment market. It has been established that the effect on earnings was the primary relevance in accounting standard to evaluate materiality in a specific case. However, the answer to that question will usually be affected by the nature of the item; items too small to be thought material, if they result from routine transactions, may be considered material if they arise in abnormal circumstances. Thus, materiality of an item depends not only upon its relative size, but also upon its nature or combination of both, that is, on either quantitative or qualitative characteristics, or on both. No change to a preferred accounting method can be made without sacrificing consistency; there is no way that accounting can develop without change.

It is a concept, that seems easy to understand but hard to define because perceptions of reality differ. In essence, economic reality means an accurate measurement, of the business operations, that is, economic costs and benefits generated in business activity. Almost always, the relative rather than the absolute size of a judgment item determines whether it should be considered material in a given situation.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

This information must be included in the financial statements because investors or lenders’ decisions might be affected by this information. Presentation of information should not only facilitate understanding but also avoid wrong interpretation of financial statements. Thus, understandable financial accounting information presents data that can be under-stood by users of the information and is expressed in a, form and with terminology adopted to the user’s range of understanding. Some items of information presented in an annual report may be more reliable than others.

Ideally, financial reporting should produce information that is both more reliable and more relevant. In some situations, however, it may be necessary to sacrifice some of one quality for a gain in another. Relevance is affected by the materiality of information contained in the financial statements because only material information influences the economic decisions of its users. Relevance is a fundamental accounting principle stating that the financial information provided by a company should be capable of influencing the decisions of users.

To say that accounting information has predictive value is not to say that it is itself a prediction. For a company’s financial statements to have relevance they must be issued within several weeks after each accounting period ends. To achieve relevance, the financial statements will include some estimated amounts such as the accrual adjusting entries that are part of the accrual method of accounting. The pursuit of one characteristic may work against the other characteristics. It is difficult to design financial reports which may be relevant to user needs on the one hand and also free from bias towards any particular user group on the other. The qualitative characteristics should be arranged in terms of their relative importance.

Relevance and Faithful Representation

An example of relevance is someone talking about ph levels in soil during a gardening class. … Learning about the relevance of having proper pH levels in soil was helpful information for the students in the gardening club. Free from error means that the underlying process used to prepare the financial information being presented. It does not mean 100% accuracy because the cost of achieving it might be too high. Faithful representation is achieved when the financial information represents not just the legal form but the underlying economic substance of transactions. This is achieved when the information is complete, neutral and free from error.

• In particular, information that is provided to users more quickly is considered to have an increased level of relevance.
• Some reports need to be prepared quickly, say in case of takeover bid or strike.
• It is a piece of important and relevant information for the acquirer as it will influence its decision, whether paying a premium for the target company is worthwhile or not.
• Further, the costs that will remain the same with or without replacing the equipment are not relevant.

Relevance in Accounting for Whom?

The question of relevance arises after identification and recognition of the purpose for which the information will be used. It means that information relevant for one purpose may not be necessarily relevant for other purposes. Information that is not relevant, is useless because that will not aid users in making decisions. If a company wants to take a loan from a bank, then the bank will want to know first whether the company will be able to pay them back the loan with interest. Therefore, the company’s financial statements should be relevant for the bank in making its decision regarding granting a loan to the company. A ten-year-old income statement doesn’t hold much significance to an investor.

What does relevance mean in business?

To say that information should be free from bias is not to say that standards setters or providers of information should not have a purpose in mind for financial reporting. Neutrality neither means ‘without purpose’ nor does it mean that accounting should be without influence on human behaviour. Neutrality is also known as the quality of ‘freedom from bias’ or objectivity.

Company

Neutrality means that, in formulating or implementing standards, the primary concern should be the relevance and reliability of the information that results, not the effect that the new rule may have on a particular interest or user(s). Reliability may suffer when an accounting method is changed to gain relevance, and vice versa. Sometimes it may not be clear whether there has been a loss or gain either of relevance or of reliability. The reliability concept does not imply 100 per cent reliability or accuracy.

Accrual accounting is necessary for complex organisations, of course, but, where accruals and estimates have a considerable degree of uncertainty as to amount or timing, cash accounting would seem to come closer to economic realism. Of course, in some situations, the nature of some items of information may dictate their materiality regardless of their relative size or the fact that they cannot be adequately quantified. Magnitude of the item by itself, without regard to the nature of the item and the circumstances in which the judgment has to be made, will not generally be a sufficient basis for a materiality judgment. Economic decision requires making choice among possible courses of actions. In making decisions, the decision-maker will make comparisons among alternatives, which is facilitated by financial information. Comparability implies to have like things reported in a similar fashion and unlike things reported differently.

Timeliness means having information available to decision-makers before it loses its capacity to influence decisions. If information is either not available when it is needed or becomes available long after the reported events that it has no value for future action, it lacks relevance and is of little or no use. Timeliness alone cannot make information relevant, but a lack of timeliness can rob information of relevance it might otherwise have had.